Great news, thanks Olivier. I start the e4 committer nomination process. Best regards, Lars
2013/11/21 Olivier Prouvost <[email protected]> > > Hi Lars, > > Yes of course ! But before I will have to upgrade some things by merging > with the other… > > Regards > > > > <http://www.opcoach.com/> > > Olivier > Prouvost<[email protected]?subject=Demande%20de%20renseignements> > > Formation, Expertise Eclipse, Java, Open Source <http://www.opcoach.com/> > > *Mobile : +33 (0)6 28 07 65 64 <%2B33%20%280%296%2028%2007%2065%2064>* > > > > > > > > Le 21 nov. 2013 à 10:40, Lars Vogel <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Olivier, > > are you fine with moving your tool to the e4 tools project? > > Best regards, Lars > > > 2013/11/21 Olivier Prouvost <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> I started to compare the two implementations… >> >> The debug.ui implementation uses events (I discovered it !) to be >> notified from IEclipseContext … I could use it in my implementation to >> refresh the content correctly. Another feature is the display of the >> location where objects are used… I must see how it has been done... >> >> My implementation get directly the map of context using introspection and >> displays it… It is a direct display with less updates than the debug.ui >> implementation. I will update it… In my implementation the search is more >> advanced and highlight the tree nodes or tables lines where the string is >> found. >> >> I will continue to investigate and update my version as soon as possible >> ! >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> <http://www.opcoach.com/> >> >> Olivier >> Prouvost<[email protected]?subject=Demande%20de%20renseignements> >> >> Formation, Expertise Eclipse, Java, Open Source <http://www.opcoach.com/> >> >> *Mobile : +33 (0)6 28 07 65 64 <%2B33%20%280%296%2028%2007%2065%2064>* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Le 20 nov. 2013 à 16:08, Paul Webster <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I do not care much for backward compatibility... OTOH though I find it >>> important that at least one incarnation of the context explorer does not >>> drag in any dependency towards 3.x. >>> >> >> Right, I would suggest an Eclipse4 plugin and a 3.x plugin that consumes >> the Eclipse4 plugin (re-uses the work). >> >> The backward compatibility here is important. >> >> PW >> >> -- >> Paul Webster >> Hi floor. Make me a sammich! - GIR >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
