https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=425009
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Tom Schindl <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I have no problem adding this, the class is marked as an SPI @noextend > so we are fine adding abstract methods but I'md make it look different > to Display#timerExec > > I would suggest to have an API like this: > > public abstract Condition scheduleRepeatingTask(Runnable r) { > } > > public interface Condition { > public boolean valid(); > } > > Tom > > On 07.01.14 13:50, Wim Jongman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would it lead to something if I filed a bug to request the timerExec > > method in UISynchronize? Was it left out on purpose? > > > > Regards, > > > > Wim > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > e4-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
