Another model change coming is the one from Dirk on the new language switch support.
Tom Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 13.01.2014 um 22:29 schrieb Marco Descher <[email protected]>: > > Hy Eric, > > thanks for your response, and thanks a lot for the overview on the state. > I am currently working on a research project, where I want to find the > possibilities > and limitations of creating user documentation based on information within the > application model. > > To this end, I scanned the application model and am currently categorizing > these > for further processing. I am especially interested in the current situation > and > upcoming evolvement of the model, as it poses the base for my work. > > As you mentioned, the Opaque and Rendere items outlived their purpose, hence > I could > not make sense of them which led to the question. > > I find it sad, that the patches for MDialog and MWizard are going to be > removed. > Is it just this specific solution which did not fit, or is the entire > approach of > representing these elements within the application model going to be > abandoned? It did not > come clear to me in the bugzilla link. > > As the documentation, I want to create out of the application model, is > targeted to fit to ISO 26514 (see > http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/26514-2010.html) I already > identified some elements which are not represented within the > current application model - such as the missing Dialog and Wizards. > > What interests me especially, is whether the „Cheatsheets“ as used in E3 are > up for discussion > of inclusion into the application model. As they can be seen as the > equivalent of > an ISO 26514 „Procedure“. > > All the best, > Marco > > An 13. Jänner 2014 at 21:14:39, Eric Moffatt ([email protected]) schrieb: >> >> >> Marco, sorry for the delay but I'm back and rarin' to go now ! >> >> First, thanks for the 'kick'...this disappeared from the radar >> mostly >> because we don't have an explicit defect open for it. We do still >> intend to >> remove the code for the 'Opaque' and 'Rendered' items since they >> only need >> access to run-time data which can be stored in the 'transientData' >> map >> (which wasn't there when we did the original design). I've just >> started >> looking at that this afternoon... >> >> As far as new elements go we've added a list of MDialogs and MWizards >> to >> the MApplication model but these are experimental and may well >> be removed >> based on the feedback we've received on >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=421462. >> >> I don't know of any other changes but I'm still a bit fuzzy from >> the >> vacation...;-). Is there something you were particularly interested >> in ? >> >> Onwards, >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> From: Marco Descher >> >> To: E4 Project developer mailing list , >> >> Date: 01/10/2014 07:03 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [e4-dev] Questions on e4 state >> >> Sent by: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear List, >> >> I asked about the state of certain application model elements, >> a week and a >> month ago, please see the enclosed mail. >> Interestingly I find, that no one seems to have an answer on these >> questions. Could it be, that there is no one >> assigned to this, or that I am simply querying on the wrong list? >> >> In case (no one responsible), may I ask who did the original work >> on the >> application model, and if there is a ticket for this? A search >> for >> application model in bugzilla is not really useful. >> >> Thanks again, >> Marco >> >> An 06. Jänner 2014 at 08:27:47, Marco Descher ([email protected]) >> schrieb: >>> >>> Hy list, >>> >>> a few months ago there was a discussion on the list that it is the >>> time to figure out what we need in e4. I would be very interested >>> in the following status-quo information; so if anybody could >>> please help me out! >>> >>> * What elements are now planned to be added to the application >>> model? Is there a ticket for this? >>> * What happens to the elements in the application model, that >>> are already considered for removal, but still there like: >>> Rendered* >>> Opaque* >>> * What about the elements marked as Provisional for 4.3 like >>> ToolBarContribution(s), >>> TrimContribution(s), >>> MenuContribution(s) >>> >>> If there is a working group considering the help system I would >>> be very much interested in getting involved, as I am currently >>> working on a research project where I try to harvest the application >>> model to generate application documentation! >>> >>> Thanks to all of you, >>> Marco >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> e4-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev > > _______________________________________________ > e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev _______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
