Slip of the tongue.

Olivier has to organize the first barbeque this summer.

All in favor say "aye".

Cheers,

Wim



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Olivier Prouvost <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Lars, Tom, and all the team,
>
> Of course, my comment was not aimed at anyone in particular but more on
> the whole. Maybe I should have said 'coordination' rather than
> 'motivation'. And I learned that coordination is not the fact of one, but
> of each member of the team... For example, it seemed obvious to me to have an
> E4 BOF during the Eclipse Con, to exchange ideas on the next steps or how
> E4 is seen in the industry or by other Eclipse projects. I proposed to have
> one and it was organized. Unfortunately I did not tweet about it and it was
> a little short for all the questions still opened...
>
> So everyone is well motivated, of course, no worries ... Do not begin to
> say ... hey why do you say that *I am* not motivated ?... :)
>
> Regards
> Olivier
>
>
> Le 24 mars 2014 à 10:58, Lars Vogel <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > I got the feeling of a not really motivated team..
>
> I fall asleep before the BOF session because I worked the whole night on
> fixing Eclipse 4 bugs. Not nice to hear I'm not motivated.
>
> Best regards, Lars
>
>
> 2014-03-23 0:05 GMT+01:00 Olivier Prouvost <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> Thank you Wim :) !
>>
>> I learned a lot during this econ 2014 and especially on the development
>> process. I reviewed some bugs during the hackhathon with the help of lars.
>>
>> I must say that the system is really good when it is well parametrized :)
>>
>> So I really want to involve in bug fixing and reviews :)
>>
>> But after my holidays. I am now in porto rico for a week.
>>
>> It is a pity noy to have seen you at eclipse con. I hope you will find
>> time for other cons... :)
>>
>> We had a bof and e4 like in boston. Actually none was organized but i
>> urged paul to organise one.. It was not a great success unfortunately.
>> Lars, tom and sopot did not assist :-( I tried to get information about the
>> new dialog entry in the model, it seems to really suck and for me dialogs
>> must not stay in model.. Or on the condition to classify dialogs like pref,
>> prop, ... So as to describe the hierarchy..
>>
>> I got the feeling of a not really motivated team..
>>
>> May be we could speak about it on skype later.
>>
>> See you
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>
>> Olivier Prouvost
>> 06 28 07 65 64
>>
>> > Le 21 mars 2014 à 11:15, Wim Jongman <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> >
>> > Works great Olivier. Thanks!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Wim
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > e4-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> e4-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Reply via email to