Filed https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=442659
Sopot On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sopot Çela <[email protected]> wrote: > I also agree to restructure the project. We can open a mother bug and > create children for what needs to be done. I also commit time to work on > this. > > Sopot > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Dirk Fauth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> For Eclipse users and developers of Eclipse 4 applications it is not >> understandable why the tooling needs to be installed separately from a >> different update site. After the move it would be more consistent to our >> users. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Lars Vogel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think the main issue people have with the e4 tools is that they cannot >>> install from directly from the update site of the Eclipse release. I >>> asked in the cross mailing list how the e4 tools can be part of the Mars >>> update site. >>> >>> Wayne explained that we would have to move the e4 tools to a new >>> project. Here is his explanation how to do it: >>> ---------------------------- >>> >>> To move the code out of the project, you need to do a restructuring >>> review. Restructuring reviews are relatively simple affairs that require >>> you describe (as concisely as possible) what needs to to change and why. >>> >>> To restructure by moving, you need a project to move the code into. >>> >>> This could be an existing project (e.g. PDT), or one that we create. If >>> a new project is required, then we need to do a proposal followed by a >>> creation review. We can combine the creation review with the restructuring >>> review. >>> >>> There's more here: >>> >>> >>> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Restructuring_Reviews >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> Wayne >>> >>> ------------------ >>> >>> If the active e4 committers and our users agree, I personally think we >>> should go ahead and create this structuring review. >>> >>> How do people think about this? Should we go ahead with this >>> restructuring review? >>> >>> Best regards, Lars >>> >>> P.S. I would be interesting to work on the restructuring review. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> e4-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
