On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> wrote:
> In contrast to (Mickael please correct me) the TextMate and LSP stuff > I've implemented my stuff on pure e4 technologies (I don't even need > core.resources although for the sample) so it is as lightweight as > possible. > Right, As both the generic editor and LSP4E are targeting the regular Eclipse IDE and to integrate seamlessly in it -that's for example why we want to integrate with core.resources-, they're not designed as pure-e4 because it is not perceived as profitable for developers and adopters. However, any help in making those editors lighter, more reusable, or leverage more existing e4 or e4-based goodness would be welcome - as long as it keeps good old extension points and integrates seamlessly in the IDE. Targeting alternative IDEs such as e(fx)clipse or some ultra-light Eclipse-based distribution is currently out of the scope of what our (Red Hat Eclipse) team would like to work on; but we'd support anyone who wants to make it possible without diminishing the current value of Generic Editor or LSP4E. -- Mickael Istria Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/> developer, at Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/> community
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list e4-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
