I would recomment that IDEA first use the javadoc in source IF the source is available,
because that might be more correct/up-to-date than the javadoc, and also parsing
the javadoc will probably take longer.
Joachim Sauer wrote:
> "Scott Sirovy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>We are considering to make Ctrl+Q understand .html javadocs
>>>>instead.
>>>
>>>wow, I considered suggesting that feature, but I thought it
>>>belonged in the "wrong cost-value ratio"-category.
>>
>>
>>Is that the "politically correct" way to tell the JetBrains folks
>>that you give their idea a -1?
>>
>>:)
>
>
> *g* no, it's my way of saying: I'd love this feature, but I thought that
> i was pretty alone on this place.
>
> Now that I re-think it, it's actually pretty good on the value side, so
> the high cost will probably be worth it. How often do I open up the
> Servlet API documentation in Mozilla, 'cause I got no sources for
> javax.servlet.* ...
>
> regards
> Joachim Sauer
>
>
--
Erb
==============================================================
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer.
There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris."
- Larry Wall
==============================================================
_______________________________________________
Eap-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
