You are right Mike it doesn't break anything. It had to do with test first designing your exception specification but I lost the specifics. I will be out of hand for couple of weeks for vacation ;-) So you will have one less feature hungry happy customer on your back. Too bad I am going to wait 2 weeks to taste #630! Look at me! Having some regret to go in vacation because of an IDE. This is a praise for you JetBrains guys... Ok I am a geek too...
"Mike Aizatsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message aed5i9$78c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:aed5i9$78c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Jacques, > > > Is it the intended behavior not to have the option to add the new > exception > > to overriding methods in subclasses? > > No. But do you think that there should be? Java allows to have less "throws" > arguments in descendants, so this shouldn't break anything. > > -- > Best regards, > Mike Aizatsky. > ------------------------------ > JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software > http://www.intellij.com > "Develop with pleasure!" > > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
