I agree. Maybe an option: either color highlight in the users's prefered custom color scheme, or if that's a problem, an option to turn off color highlighting. Using the 'default' scheme is not an appropriate solution, as it's jarring and confusing.
"Edoardo Comar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks Valentin. > Having coloring in a different scheme is IMO worse than having no coloring, > so my preference is for the lines NOT to be colored except for the > matching text (bold/red/whatever you want). > > Edo > > Valentin Kipiatkov wrote: > > It's not a bug. Actually we decided to use default coloring scheme to > > prevent conflicts with other colors (like selection in the tree etc). The > > coloring scheme configured by the user could be rather different from the > > standard (e.g. white letters on black background). That might cause the tree > > to become unreadable at all. > > It seems that highlighting of the match of the search in bold is enough make > > it visually distinguished. > > > > -- > > Valentin Kipiatkov > > JetBrains, Inc > > http://www.intellij.com > > "Develop with pleasure!" > > > > "Edoardo Comar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > >>It's nice that the lines of the results of a text search are colored to > >>distinguish java keywords, constants etc. > >> > >>but I'd rather have them uncolored (except to highlight the match of the > >>search) than having them using a coloring schema that's different from > >>the project's. A bug, IMO. > >> > >>see image. > >> > >>Edo > >> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
