http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/interfaces.doc.html#78651
JLS 9.4: "It is permitted, but strongly discouraged as a matter of style, to redundantly specify the public modifier for interface methods." "Robert F. Beeger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thomas Singer wrote: > >>Why isn't it declared public like in my implementing class ? > > > > > > Because in a interface you need not to define any visibility; it's > > automatically public. If you have the extra "public", I think, Jikes > > will show a warning message, that it is useless. > Well, my fellow-programmers and I often practice "state the obvious". So > although it is not stricly necessary, I'd like to have an option that > the visibility modifier is nevertheless inserted. > > --- > Greets > Robert > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
