With files that big, maybe you should explore some of the refactoring features :)
sw > -----Original Message----- > From: Nikolay Nikolov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Eap-bugs] Re: Performance issues > > > I just did an experiment with 4 files: > A - 6,700 lines > B - 6,000 lines > C - 1,800 lines > D - 1,400 lines > > Files A, B are very long files that consist mostly of long > methods, and some > inner classes. > Files C, D differ mostly in level of complexity, D is class > with many short > methods, D has few but very long methods. > > Parse times: > A, #650: initial 45sec, after minor changes 20-30sec > A, #651: initial 60sec, after minor changes consistently > 25sec (and 60sec > once) > > B, #650: initial 25sec, after minor changes 25-30sec > B, #651: initial 25sec, after minor changes 20-25sec > > C, #650: initial 10sec, after minor changes 9sec > C, #651: initial 12sec, after minor changes 9sec > > D, #650: initial ?, after minor changes 3sec > D, #651: initial 10sec, after minor changes 3sec > > Editing all files (D less noticeably), causes delays when typing. > ----------------------------- > > IMHO initial time to parse is ok, but a more intelligent > incremental parser > will make a big difference. > Hope this helps. > --nikolay > > > "Eugene Belyaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > anctdh$c14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:anctdh$c14$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > > > In #651 we have fixed a number of performance issues, so > please check it > and > > report asap. > > > > Thanks, > > Eugene Belyaev > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-bugs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
