Also, why do setters use "this." and getters don't? This also applies to "Encapsulate fields" refactoring.
I'd like to have "this." in both getters and setters. If it's a static member that's set or gotten, I use "ClassName.staticMemberName = staticMemberName;" and "return ClassName.staticMemberName;" respectively. It's very verbose, I know, but I like it that way :-) -Thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: Kirk Woll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Eap-features] Insert Setter > > > I prefer the parameter for my set methods to be in the style > "new" + the > property name. i.e. > > public void setName(String newName) { > this.name = newName; > } > > rather than > > public void setName(String name) { > this.name = name; > } > > Can this be made an option? > > Kirk > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > ************************************ If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT. ************************************ _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
