> Before any of this though, multiple output paths are VITAL > for comfortable J2EE development. I know everyone says use > ant, but invoking ant is infinitely slower than just > compiling one file with jikes from within IDEA.
Yes, sure. We'll address this right after the Pandora release. Best regards, Eugene Belyaev IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure" > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hani Suleiman > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Eap-features] EJB - go to declaration and interfaces > > > My vote is for 1. It's very rare that an EJB is defined in > multiple ejb-jar's, it might be referenced in many, but the > entity/session definition will be in one bundle. It also > opens the door for parsing the web.xml to allow for taglib > completion in jsp's! > > Before any of this though, multiple output paths are VITAL > for comfortable J2EE development. I know everyone says use > ant, but invoking ant is infinitely slower than just > compiling one file with jikes from within IDEA. > > On 21/11/01 7:08 am, "Eugene Belyaev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We've had some discussions on this before. The main > question here is > > how IDEA will know that the three classes should be treated as a > > single EJB. Obviously, IDEA have to store this information > somewhere. > > > > There are a couple of ways: > > > > 1) It should round-trip some ejb-jar.xml > > Cons: bound to a specific ejb-jar. If the bean is used in > more than > > one ejb-jar it won't work. > > > > 2) Have some IDEA specific ejb information > > Pros: not bound to any deployment related stuff > > Cons: will have to specify the same information in different places > > > > So here we are, your suggestions are welcome. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Eugene Belyaev > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com > > "Develop with pleasure" > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephan J. > >> Schmidt > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:49 PM > >> To: Descher, Michael > >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: Re: [Eap-features] EJB - go to declaration and interfaces > >> > >> > >>> > >>> If you put all business methods in the remote interface without > >>> another interface class, your EJB class of course does not > >> implement > >>> the interface. In this case you would need the ability to > >> specify some > >>> sort of naming convention to help IDEA find the bean > class for the > >>> remote interface. > >>> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> A lot of IDEA features do not work for us, because > >> we have EJBs. (Person, PersonBean, PersonHome,...) > >> It would be nice if IDEA could recognize (naming > >> convention) relationships between these classes, > >> > >> bye > >> -stephan > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Eap-features mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-> features > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-features mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
