+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell Gold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Eap-features] Request: modification to extract interface > refactoring > > > I would like to specify when I extract an interface (and possibly a > superclass) whether it is the original class or the new > interface/class > which will keep the existing name, so that the other gets the > new name. > > It is very common that I do this because I want to make > something more > general, and my current implementation should simply be one way to > implement the class. In such cases, I would want all > references to this > class that are not 'extends' or constructor calls to retain > the original > name - which should now be the name of the interface or > superclass. I can > apparently do this by extracting an interface with a different name, > letting IDEA rename all possible uses, then renaming both the > original > class and the interface, but it doesn't seem reliable, and it > forces me to > modify (and then modify back) all of the references to the > original class. > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features >
************************************ If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. You should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT. ************************************ _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
