*nod* Hani mentioned it - it's called XDoclet ;)

Basically all your EJBs are written in a single class, with all
deployment information in JavaDoc comments, then an Ant task parses your
beans and creates all the interfaces, J2Ee deployment descriptors and
app server deployment descriptors. It's a life saver for managing EJBs
IMHO.

-mike

On Fri, 2001-12-07 at 09:06, Michael Descher wrote:
> Well, there are two ways you can do stuff. Either put everything in a single
> fat application (like JBuilder) or have specialized tools for each task. I
> think specialized tools are the way to go since you can startup the things
> you need and don't need to load tens of megs no matter if you need them all
> the time or just sometimes.
> 
> IDEAs file synchronization makes it easy to have multiple tools open even
> editing the same files. This way you can have your favourite UML tool for
> example running together with IDEA, using the UML tool for things it is good
> at and using IDEA for the "hardcore" coding.
> 
> In the same manner I'd rather like to have a standalone EJB tool for
> creating base classes, deployment descriptor, etc. and keep IDEA clean and
> simple (yet powerful) for editing Java source (in the first place),
> compiling projects, running ant tasks.
> 
> By the way, is there any (good) such EJB tool that is made just for (and
> therefore specialized on) managing EJBs and related stuff (like deployment
> descriptors)?
> 
> Michael
> 
> > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Ingi Gauti
> > Ragnarsson
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 22:34
> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Betreff: [Eap-features] Re: EJB wizard
> >
> >
> > I can hear that you are not that happy with my suggestion, I'm not a
> > wizard guy, the application I used before IntelliJ was TextPad, and I
> > still use it for lot's of other editing other than Java files.
> >
> > But do you realize how quicker you would be programming CMP beans, if
> > the Entity bean, ejb-jar.xml file and helper classes would all be
> > connected. Change one variable, and it would change all the files. Also
> > all the debugging trouble you get sometimes with EJB beans. Like if a
> > method in the remote interface isn't the same as in the as in the EJB
> > bean, you get an error and lot's of other things. I have no doubt that
> > if you have developed a EJB bean you know that everything has to be
> > perfect.
> >
> > Well that's my thought.
> > Ingi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eap-features mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-features mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
-- 
Cheers,
Mike

-- 
Mike Cannon-Brookes :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
     Supporting YOUR J2EE World



_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features

Reply via email to