I still like ImplementMethod, but as long as it's there, I'm not picky :) -----Original Message----- From: Dimiter Dimitrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 January 2002 00:57 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Eap-features] Test-First Design - Need a forward code comple tion or code generation.
BTW could somebody tell me why do you call this feature "programming by intention"? It has nothing to do with Charles Simonyi paper http://www.aisto.com/roeder/active/ifip96.pdf and in fact ForwardCodeCompletion sounds to me much better.. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nemec, Richard > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:30 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Eap-features] Test-First Design - Need a forward code > completion or code generation. > > > > I'd use forward generation when writing methods too. I often write > > method a() that calls b() before writing b() -- it would be great > > if forward generation helps here. > > There are many people waiting for that feature. Desperately. > Another term used for that was "programming by intention". > > r. > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
