Yes, sure it works in this way. Do you have any example when it recompiles
something which should not be recompiled?

Best regards,
Valentin Kipiatkov
-----------------------------------------------------------
 IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
 "Develop with pleasure"
-----------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EAP features" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:23 PM
Subject: [Eap-features] smarter make


> I'm not sure if this is what you mean by making the Make (dependency
> compile)
> smarter, but I would like it to work so that, for example,
> if I change the body of a method,
> but not the signature, none of the classes that call that method
> get recompiled.  Same for changing anything private.  That is,
> dependencies only kick in for non-private signatures and fields,
> and maybe even limit recompile to the package if something package-scope
> changes.
> --
>
> Erb
>
> ==============================================================
> "The only time I like in the morning is afternoon."
>      - Russell D. Cooper
>
> "If you do everything, then you're all done."
>      - Melissa F. Cooper
>
> "Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer.
> There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris."
>      - Larry Wall
> ==============================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-features mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features


_______________________________________________
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features

Reply via email to