<tease> oh come on, once you've finished implementing your code, it doesn't just change like that, if it's the case maybe you should think twice about updating production code 10 times a day with beta software. besides i'm very happy to have my javadoc because i don't always remember what my method does :o) </tease>
a++ Cedric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Hanson Sent: mardi 2 avril 2002 01:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eap-features] [OT] JavaDoc or not? (was:Method contents popup window) "Cedric ROUVRAIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your extreme version of XP is more of a lazy finger deviation of the > thought, IMO. It wasn't my idea. It came from one of the authors of one of the main XP books. And it's not about being lazy, it's about not wasting time creating artifacts that are instantly out of date. Erik _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
