+1. Maybe not an integrated version in this release, but certainly a tiny amount of consideration when implementing the open apis isn't unreasonable, esp. since they're in the process of being developed this release.
This is a feature request list, and I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for what you want. I'm sure the intellij folks can prioritize, with usability and stability probably right at the top. --pete -----Original Message----- From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eap-features] aspects in idea What, another amazing killer feature that no serious java programmer can possibly live without? -1 (because any number larger than that is meaningless...one person, one vote) My vote goes for having a usable stable reasonably performing IDEA first (the current eap isn't any of those). I desperately hope the folks at intellij realise this before adding on even more less-than-very-useful features. (biting my tongue very very hard to avoid naming specific useless features than have gotten in due to whimsical user requests) Hani On 17/4/02 5:29 pm, "Jim Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +20 > > At the very least, please make sure the new SDK for IDEA allows for an AJDE > like in Forte, JBuilder and Eclipse. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Reiff, Glen > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:18 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: AW: [Eap-features] aspects in idea > > > > +10 > > Glen, AOP infected > > -- > Glen Reiff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de > software design & management > Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 Muenchen, Germany > Tel +49 89 63812-705, Fax -490 > > >> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: >> Mittwoch, 27. M�rz 2002 19:50 >> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Betreff: [Eap-features] aspects in idea >> >> Are there any plans to incorporate support for aspectJ in to >> IDEA. Would >> this be better implemented through the tools api? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ted Slusser > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
