I definitely think that a graphical (UML) class representation would have been a hundred times more useful than code-folding and split editor screen (the latter restricted to one file). Not to mention the marketing effects. Make it (de-)installable, charge extra for it, and everybody will be happy.
"David Kitner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The last thing we need is another product trying to do more than it > should. IntelliJ is a great Java Editor. Adding non-editor features > simply slows down the app, and takes more time away from developing the > editor features we all desire. > > John D wrote: > > Are there any plans to integrate UML tools with IntelliJ? Maybe as a snap-in > > so people who do not want/need it do not have to have the overhead of it. > > MagicDraw is a great candidate. > > > > Awesome product! Please keep it fast and robust and don't bury it in crap > > like JBuilder (did I type that out loud?) > > > > -- > > > > John De Lello > > DelWare Software Solutions, LLC > > Programming solutions for today's complex problems > > http://www.DelWare.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
