+1 for that! I would love to have that, it would make my life much easier

Jan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonas Envall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 09:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line


+1 for that!

I think the javadoc is an important area where IntelliJ should put some
work.
We use javadoc all the time and support for automatic parameters, return
values and code completion would be helpful.

Ara Abrahamian wrote:

> Anyway, code completion doesn't work in javadoc comments, something like
> this:
> /**
> * @see #|
> */
>
> I want IDEA to show method/field names after the | as it does for normal
> java codes. And not just that but for link/etc.
>
> Ara.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On
> > Behalf Of Bluntpeak
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:19 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> >
> > I have to say that a few days ago I was of the opposite opinion,
> > however, I too have been converted by idea and now put javadoc almost
> > everywhere.
> >
> > So all we need now is better javadoc editing support . . .
> >
> > H
> >
> >
> > Scott Sirovy wrote:
> >
> > > As do I.
> > >
> > > I find I am now putting javadoc in my code more than ever, just
> because
> > it
> > > helps me out later when I hit CTRL-Q.
> > >
> > > -sms
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jason Boehle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:02 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> > >
> > >
> > > I heartily agree with Carlos on this one.
> > >
> > > Jason Boehle
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:43 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Due to the number of mails to the list on this subject, it seems
> that
> > > what most people want/expect is that idea handles any comment before
> a
> > > method as belonging to the method.
> > >
> > > This means handling all comments as you do the javadoc comments now
> -
> > > and a group of // without empty lines in between count's as a
> comment.
> > >
> > > FWIW, it took me some time, but now I like what idea forced me to
> do:
> > > write every comment before a method or a field as a javadoc and have
> it
> > > always available with a control-q.
> > >
> > > Using // and /* (as method comments) are just old time vices.
> > >
> > > I would say -1 here. Let idea continue to force me to produce
> correct
> > > code with correct docs.
> > >
> > > Carlos.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: quarta-feira, 17 de Outubro de 2001 18:17
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Well, you are right. How do you think it should detect that
> > >>the preceding
> > >>comment belongs to the method (field, static, initializer)?
> > >>Do you think any
> > >>comment before a method should be considered as attached to
> > >>it? Or only when
> > >>there is no blank lines between them?
> > >>
> > >>Best regards,
> > >>Valentin Kipiatkov
> > >>-----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
> > >> "Develop with pleasure"
> > >>-----------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>From: "Tal Dayan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 7:33 PM
> > >>Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>Do you think static initializer blocks can have javadoc comments?
> > >>>>
> > >>>Not necesarily, but without the extra '*' in the comments,
> > >>>
> > >>IDEA *never*
> > >>does
> > >>
> > >>>the
> > >>>method seperation correctly.
> > >>>
> > >>>Here is an example with 4 cases. As you can see, IDEA's
> > >>>
> > >>choice of line
> > >>
> > >>>seperation is
> > >>>non intuitive in all these cases:
> > >>>
> > >>>  /*
> > >>>   *
> > >>>   */
> > >>>  --------------------------------------
> > >>>  static int a;
> > >>>
> > >>>  /**
> > >>>   *
> > >>>   */
> > >>>  --------------------------------------
> > >>>  static {
> > >>>    a = 5;
> > >>>  }
> > >>>
> > >>>  /*
> > >>>   *
> > >>>   */
> > >>>  --------------------------------------
> > >>>  static {
> > >>>    a = 5;
> > >>>  }
> > >>>
> > >>>  /*
> > >>>   *
> > >>>   */
> > >>>  --------------------------------------
> > >>>  void method()
> > >>>  {
> > >>>  }
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>Tal
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Best regards,
> > >>>>Valentin Kipiatkov
> > >>>>-----------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
> > >>>> "Develop with pleasure"
> > >>>>-----------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>
> > >>>>----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>From: "Tal Dayan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 9:40 AM
> > >>>>Subject: [Eap-list] Improper method seperation line
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Consider the following code:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>  /**
> > >>>>>   * Init the array of prepared int values as string
> > >>>>>   */
> > >>>>>  ------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>  static {
> > >>>>>    for (int i=0; i<intAsString.length; i++)
> > >>>>>    {
> > >>>>>      intAsString[i] = String.valueOf(i);
> > >>>>>    }
> > >>>>>  }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>IDEA (506) positions the method seperation line after
> > >>>>>
> > >>the comment
> > >>block
> > >>
> > >>>>>which is
> > >>>>>not the expected behavior.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Tal
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>>>Eap-list mailing list
> > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>>Eap-list mailing list
> > >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>_______________________________________________
> > >>>Eap-list mailing list
> > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Eap-list mailing list
> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Eap-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Eap-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > DISCLAIMER
> > > This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use
> by
> > the
> > > addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
> > > confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of
> this
> > > e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or
> > > copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
> > prohibited.
> > > If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify
> me
> > and
> > > permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any
> > printout
> > > thereof.
> > >
> > > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.
> > The
> > > sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
> omissions
> > in
> > > the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail
> > transmission.
> > >
> > > NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY
> > >
> > > Knight Trading Group may, at its discretion, monitor and review the
> > content
> > > of all e-mail communications.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Eap-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eap-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list



_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list


Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com           
                                                          
IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is
intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER

_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to