Well, my main complaint was about the parameter names; the method name issue I understand.
Don Stewart wrote: > I agree, it's a little annoying, the method names would be nicer if it > dropped the prefix characters > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 09 November 2001 16:29 > To: EAP > Subject: [Eap-list] prefix issue > > > In my Code Style settings, I have prefix for fields set as "_", > but none for anything else. > I add a setter for a static field that starts with "_". > The parameter for the setter is the same as the field name, > including the underscore. I think it should not be. > > I get: > > private static UserInterface _userInterface; > > public static void set_userInterface(UserInterface _userInterface) { > ClientInitializer._userInterface = _userInterface; > } > > > I want: > / > / private static UserInterface _userInterface; > > public static void set_userInterface(UserInterface userInterface) { > _userInterface = userInterface; > } > > (Well, OK, I really also want "setUserInterface", but that's another story.) > > -- Erb ============================================================== "The only time I like in the morning is afternoon." - Russell D. Cooper "If you do everything, then you're all done." - Melissa F. Cooper "Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall ============================================================== _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
