-1 here too. If I remember correctly IDEA used to contain Tomcat but it got dropped.
It strikes me that the power of this eap-list is that we seem to get some say about how the people in Prague prioritise their development efforts - not many products you can say that about. My feeling is that they should devote it to the refactorings - other IDEs will give you app server integration, visual gui builders etc, no problem there - build the GUI in JBuilder, and then launch IDEA and make the code sweet. The USP of IDEA really is in the refactoring capability - this is what needs to be concentrated on my two cents Jon -----Original Message----- From: Yura Cangea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Feature Requests On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:48:20 -0500, Christopher Cobb wrote: -10, I wouldn't want IDEA to contain tomcat distribution. >I don't want any wizards, either. I just want to be able to compile my JSP >pages to see if there are any errors! Tomcat's jspc is just about as easy >to invoke as javac, so 'integration' would entail: > - including the tomcat distribution (put it right next to jikes) > - invoking jspc when CTRL-F9 is pressed on a JSP page > - throw away the generated class files > >Now, debugging JSP pages would also be nice, but that's a whole different >story. > >cc > >Edoardo Comar wrote: > >> -1 to any appserver integration. If you want wizards go jbuilder. >> I like IDEA to be raw. The power of plain code editing and analysis >> >> Edo >> >> PS - feature request should go to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Not >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Christopher Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: 27 November 2001 15:53 >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Feature Requests >> > >> > >> > That's where Tomcat interation would be nice. In JBuilder 5 >> > you can hit CTRL-F9 on a JSP page and it appears to call >> > Tomcat's jspc compiler to compile the page. Even if you are >> > not using Tomcat as a JSP container, it would still be nice >> > to be able to directly compile JSP pages, even if you end up >> > throwing away the generated class files. >> > >> > "Nemec, Richard" wrote: >> > >> > > Mike,(1) this feature might be very expensive. Every app. >> > server has >> > > its own JSP compiler andthere is no plain common mapping >> > between these >> > > two. You can do something like thatin Forte, but that is one of >> > > reasons why is it so HUGE.(2) You can do that. Menu: Code/Implement >> > > methods... r. >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Mike Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:55 PM >> > > To: Eap-List@Intellij. Com >> > > Subject: [Eap-list] Feature Requests >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Hopefully this is where I submit feature requests.Here's >> > > two: >> > > >> > > 1)JSP Debugging.On the actual JSP file, not the compiled >> > > servlet >> > > >> > > 2)"Implement methods" feature where it automatically creates >> > > the method signatures defined in the interface(s) for the >> > > class that implements these interface(s). >> > > >> > > Any votes? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > >> > > Mike Liu >> > > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Eap-list mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-> list >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Eap-list mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
