Exactly ! If hard core means, hand coding every template JUnit class then I'm glad I'm not hardcore. I have other real interesting functionality to implement.
If hardcore means no wizards or help, we'ed all be using something like edlin. The reason we like idea is, because it halps real programmers program. Don -----Original Message----- From: Alain RAVET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 December 2001 12:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (OT) What is a wizard (was [Eap-list] JUnit Tests) Many people draw a line in the sand. . IDEA is on 1 side, . Wizards, and JBuilder, are on the other. I wonder what it takes, for them, to "make" a, to "be called" a wizard? ? previous/next/finish buttons like in "New Project" ? 2 checkboxes, 12 rediobuttons, 1 vertical slider and 2 text fields, like in Generate Javadoc ? a inner table with checkbox in 1 columns, ... like in "Encapsulate fields" ? I think we should not limit ourselves to wishing simple features just to avoid using the word "wizard" in the RFE. Some refactorings need UI interfaces that go beyond the simple Yes/No dialog. I don't care if it takes a wizard, as long as it help me save time and produce better code. Alain Ravet ----- Edoardo Comar wrote : >> Objet : RE: [Eap-list] JUnit Tests >> >> When IntelliJ wants to **lose its hardcore customer base**, >> they'll just have to add wizards to their IDE !! >> >> Does this answer your question? >> >> Edo This mail has been checked by exiscan. To be safe, please scan the mail attachements with your local virus scanner ! _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
