Yes, we are going to implement a SmartStep feature.

Best regards,
Eugene Zhuravlev
IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
"Develop with pleasure!"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 10 January, 2002 8:04 PM
Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Debugger Comment


> +1. This sounds very useful.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shnayderman, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:11 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: [Eap-list] Debugger Comment
> > 
> > 
> > Great job guys,
> > 
> > I have a comment about the debugger functionality.
> > Here is the scenario.
> > 1. Breakpoint at foo(bar(), bar1(), bar2())
> >    
> >    I understand that if I step-into the code I will step into 
> > bar(), then
> > bar1(), then bar2(), then foo()
> >    This makes sense with the exception, that UI gives no 
> > indication that you
> > are about to do that or did that.
> >    It would be nice if you had functionality similar to 
> > VisualAge that gives
> > you more hints on when and where you are when you do step into.
> >    One possibility is to when you are ready to step-into the function
> > highlight parameters as they are being evaluated and let the 
> > user to make a
> > selection
> >    whether to step into the function (bar()) or skip it.  I think this
> > feature would make allot of users happier.
> > 
> >    The confusion comes from the fact that most of the time I want to
> > step-into the foo(), without step-in into all the
> >    bars, but debugger forces me to evaluate bar(), if only I 
> > had a choice 
> >    foo 
> >       + 
> >         - bar   (step-into, step-over)
> >         - bar1 (step-into, step-over)
> >         - bar2 (step-into, step-over)
> > 
> > Regards, Mikhail Snayderman.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eap-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> > 
> 
> 
> ************************************
> If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for
> the delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this
> message may contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such
> a case, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.  You should
> destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
> Information contained in this message that does not relate to the
> business of ITT is neither endorsed by nor attributable to ITT.
> ************************************
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list


_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to