Yes, this would make sense. Some developers here use their own sets of javadoc notations, like @todo, which they simply grep for later. And of course we might make modifications to the javadoc generator to do something with these extra tags.
I'm not suggesting IDEA should know anything about our custom tags, but it shouldn't mark them as errors. I would expect IDEA to ignore them (no highlighting).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Singer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Eap-list] erroneous highlighting of Together/J
> doc comment
>
>
> These are invalid JavaDoc comments. But an option to prevent
> IDEA from
> checking the JavaDoc comments would be good, if you have such
> mad projects.
>
> Tom
>
> At 05:51 08.02.02 -0800, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >when using Together/J in parallel, the dependency links
> >are added to the java code as JavaDoc comments.
> >
> >/** @link dependency
> > * @label has*/
> >/*#PortletState lnkPortletState1;*/
> >
> >Those are comments are highlighted as errors. (The
> >dependency keyword is shown to be an error)
> >
> >-bj�rn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
>
The information contained in this e-mail including any attachments may constitute Corvis Corporation Proprietary Information that is subject to Non-Disclosure Agreement and cannot be disclosed to any other party without the express consent of Corvis Corporation.
If you are neither the intended recipient of this e-mail nor responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, note that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or retention of this e-mail is prohibited.
If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, we request that you notify the sender by return e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any return e-mail immediately.
