Uhhm... What about an option called "Update JavaDocs when formatting code", that creates those stubs on Ctrl-Alt-F?
Johannes Schneider -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mike Aizatsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 13:02 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [Eap-list] Marking JavaDoc errors Johannes, > And it would be wonderful, if IDEA helped us more to create those JavaDocs It's planned feature for Ariadna to generate JavaDoc stubs. > and to keep them up-to-date... Currently IDEA automatically update @param, @see, @throws tags on rename. It will also update @see tags on change signature. Do you think IDEA can do some more with this? Best regards, Mike Aizatsky. ------------------------------ IntelliJ Software, "Develop with pleasure!" http://www.intellij.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Johannes Schneider > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:49 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: AW: [Eap-list] Marking JavaDoc errors > > Yes, we agree :) > > > And it would be wonderful, if IDEA helped us more to create those JavaDocs > and to keep them up-to-date... > > > Johannes Schneider > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mike Aizatsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 12:30 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [Eap-list] Marking JavaDoc errors > > Hi, All > > There are several requests to change JavaDoc errors marking to be not > red. I'd like to argument our decision and to hear your opinion. > > The most common critique of current highlighting is the fact that > compiler will compile the file without errors. But JavaDoc _will_ > produce errors (well, at least it should :). And if there are some > errors in JavaDoc, chances are quite high that JavaDoc is outdated. And > is outdated JavaDoc better than not having it at all? I think not much > better. Just look through some Sun's classes. There's plenty of JavaDoc > errors. And we, developers, should read it and try to figure out what > should be instead of the error text. > > So, the question is: are JavaDoc errors serious ones? The answer seems > to be "yes". If you have documentation, you must keep it consistent or > throw away. > > Do you agree? > > Best regards, > Mike Aizatsky. > ------------------------------ > IntelliJ Software, "Develop with pleasure!" http://www.intellij.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
