We changed this in #606 so that the option is not applied for anonymous classes. However I don't see any reason why it should not be applied for inners.
Best regards, Valentin Kipiatkov ----------------------------------------------------------- IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ "Develop with pleasure" ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:23 PM Subject: [Eap-list] Layout code option: After class header > Hello, > > for this option I would like to have a distinction between top-level > ("normal") class and inner/anonymous class. > > Where it makes sense to add an empty line after a top-level-class: > > public abstract class QWizardDialogPane extends QAbstractDialogPane { > > protected abstract void next(); > ... > } > > it makes not (so much) sense for anonymous classes: > > SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() { > > public void run() { > // do something > } > }); > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
