Bill, We were not planning to highlight not documented parameters/functions. We are planning to add some kind of Code Inspection which will find such erroneous documentation.
Best regards, Mike Aizatsky. ------------------------------ IntelliJ Software, "Develop with pleasure!" http://www.intellij.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Bill Uetrecht > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:59 PM > To: Idea Early Access List > Subject: [Eap-list] Javadoc error highlighting doesn't handle missing or > mis-ordered parameters > > Build #606 Araidna JDK 1.3.1 > > I'm not sure if this has been reported before, so I thought I would > report it. In the following example, the javadoc is not flagged as an > error: > > > /** > * Generate a graph as an image and output it to the response > * > * @param sState Servlet state. > * @param domainType Domain identifier (planner, approval, etc) > * @param pageOffset Starting X axis element for this page > * @return True if graph creation succeeds, False > otherwise. > */ > public static String outputGraphToResponse( ServletState sState, String > graph, String view, boolean hasPaging, int pageSize, int pageOffset, > String domainType ) > { > } > > > Note that the method has 7 parameters but the javadoc only lists 3. Also > the order of the domainType and pageOffset are reversed. > > Bill U. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
