> Consider this:
>   charsMatched = currentPartNumberPattern.getMatchLength();
> When renaming "charsMatched", it used to be that "matchLength"
> was suggested (inferred from the method name).

I checked exactly on your example and it suggests "matchLength" and "length"
as variants. Doesn't it work for you? Please provide more details.

> I also thought I noticed other small things in variable name
> suggestion that used to work, but I can't remember now.
> I'll let you know when I come across them again.

The only change that I know is that it now prefers long suggestions
("matchLength") over shorter ones ("length") and puts them first. However,
we are thinking about making it an option (prefer longer names or shorter
names).
Please provide any examples where it does not work as you want.

Best regards,
Valentin Kipiatkov
-----------------------------------------------------------
 IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/
 "Develop with pleasure"
-----------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vollmer, Thomas - CannonSA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 4:27 AM
Subject: [Eap-list] 609: Problem with variable name suggestion


> I recently upgraded from 537 to 609 and so far I really like it.
> Great job (again)!
>
> I've noticed one thing though. Variable name suggestion seems to
> be different, less smart. I haven't cross-checked with build 537
> yet, so I don't know if I'm dreaming or not.
>
> Consider this:
>   charsMatched = currentPartNumberPattern.getMatchLength();
> When renaming "charsMatched", it used to be that "matchLength"
> was suggested (inferred from the method name).
>
> I also thought I noticed other small things in variable name
> suggestion that used to work, but I can't remember now.
> I'll let you know when I come across them again.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> ************************************
> If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the
> delivery of this message to the addressee, please note that this message
may
> contain ITT Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you may
not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone.  You should destroy this message
and
> kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Information contained in this
> message that does not relate to the business of ITT is neither endorsed by
> nor attributable to ITT.
> ************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list


_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to