Valentin, I don't know what percentage of properties are public, but the language, of course, allows all access levels. In any case, I suggest that properties have access icons if only for consistency with methods and fields. Note that all members of interfaces are public, but IntelliJ marks them public anyway.
/Jim White -----Original Message----- From: Valentin Kipiatkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Suggestion. Add Access Icon to Bean Node in Structure View Would it be really useful? I thought most of getters/setters are public, aren't they? Best regards, Valentin Kipiatkov ----------------------------------------------------------- IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ "Develop with pleasure" ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "IntelliJ EAP List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:06 PM Subject: [Eap-list] Suggestion. Add Access Icon to Bean Node in Structure View > In the Structure view, I suggest that you add, to a bean's node in the tree, > an icon that shows the bean's access (public, private, etc.). If the bean > has just a getter or just a setter, the bean's access is that of the getter or > setter. If the bean has both a getter and a setter and the two have the > same access, the bean's access is that of the getter and setter. > Otherwise, the bean's access is undefined and not shown. #609. /Jim White > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
