>1. When extracting method which contains a "continue" statement and
>returns "void" - change the continue to return (it shouldn't work if the
>statement is "continue <label>").
And what, if the piece of code contains a "break" or both, a "break" AND a
"continue"?
Tom
At 12:05 13.03.02 +0200, you wrote:
>I have another issue:
>
>When want to extract the body of a loop and it has continue statements
>in it, I always have to manually replace "continue" with "/*continue*/"
>and after the extraction to replace "/*continue*/" with return. The same
>for inlining a method in a loop.
>
>Since I often have to deal with old code, I often find myself extracting
>some parts of a larger method, refactoring them and if not used
>anywhwhere else - inlining them back (or sometimes deleting them :)
>
>
>Requests:
>
>1. When extracting method which contains a "continue" statement and
>returns "void" - change the continue to return (it shouldn't work if the
>statement is "continue <label>").
>
>2. This is somewhat ugly, but is stil usefull while refactoring: When
>inlining method which has "void" return type and multiple exit points,
>wrap the method in a "do{<method_body_here>}while (false)" and replace
>each return with break. This especially combined with the new code
>inspections could make use.
>
>regards,
>dimiter
>
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 58
>From: Mark Swinkels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Extract Method with multiple exit points
>Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:09:29 -0800
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Can you give an example along with what you expect it to do?
>
>Once the method has been extracted the only exit point is by definition
>the
>call site, there isn't any way to jump from inside the function to
>multiple
>destinations in the calling code.
>
>I use extract method all the time and have received this error only once
>or
>twice.
>
>-- Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bradshaw, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:25a
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: [Eap-list] Extract Method with multiple exit points
>
>
>Can someone please explain to me why I cannot "extract method" when
>there
>are multiple exit points? What I have to end up doing is a simple
>cut-and-paste. I do not understand why this is disallowed? This makes
>this
>refactoring almost useless to me. Every single time I've tried to use
>it,
>it's given me this error, so I have to fall back to cutting and pasting.
>Since what I'm doing is so straight-foward, I cannot understand why IDEA
>has
>this restriction and refuses to just do what I ask it to. Some
>enlightenment, please? I figure there has to be a reason, and I'd like
>to
>know what that is before I file an official "feature request" or "bug
>report" on this. :-)
>
>Thanks!
>
>_______________________________________________
>Eap-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Eap-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
