Yes, agreed with Erb. Looks like this extra functionality will only complicate the dialog and the refactoring itself. The better way is to let the user decide what he/she wants.
Best regards, Eugene Zhuravlev IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ "Develop with pleasure!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 19:22 Subject: Re: [Eap-list] 611: Error in change signature > -1, that's what the error bars are for. Maybe you want a local variable, > maybe to eliminate all usages. Why overload the dialog? I know IDEA does > almost everything for me, but I need something for me to do :) > > Stefan Mainz wrote: > > If i change the signature of a method and remove a parameter > > this parameter is removed in the method signature and the > > calls. The code does not compile, if the parameter has been > > used in the method. I propose to introduce a local variable > > initialized to some value which can be provided in the dialog > > or to show the problems and not do the refactoring. > > > -- > > Erb > > ============================================================== > "The only time I like in the morning is afternoon." > - Russell D. Cooper > > "If you do everything, then you're all done." > - Melissa F. Cooper > > "Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. > There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." > - Larry Wall > ============================================================== > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
