Further it would be nice if support for the jdk1.4 tags were added (e.g. @inheritdoc).
I also noticed that intellij no longer flags unsupported javadoc tags as errors. Was this deliberate? I actually liked the stricter checking. I assume this was done to allow for local coding standards that define custom javadoc tags (i.e. @todo). Would it be possible to provide a way to enter a list of such exclusions, so that the rest could be considered errors again? Thanks, Mike On 18 Mar 2002 at 23:15, Timothy M. Dean wrote: > Is there any plan in Ariadna to tie the new Javadoc generation featurs > in with the auto-creation of methods and constructors? For example, > let's say I do an Alt-Insert and opt to generate a getter and setter. > It would be nice if, assuming I had set it up in my project or IDE > options, the generated methods automatically included the Javadoc that > goes with those methods. Ideally, I could define templates for > getters, setters, and constructors in the same way I can currently > define for class or interface definitions. > > - Tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
