-----Original Message-----
> Tim,
>
>> - Schema files should never me marked with errors if the
>> elements/attributes
>> used in that file are considered valid according to the schema
spec.
>
>
>Such level of support should be already reached. (Of course there might
be some bugs :) )
Thanks - I had noticed improvements with build #612, so I currently have
no bugs to report ;) I'll let you know if anything new comes up.
>> - For XML instance documents that are being validated against a
schema,
>> I would aim to support all "structural" elements such as
<sequence>,
>> <all>, etc.
>
>
>They should be also supported by now. However they are supported a bit
differently than it is required by schema. >We do not require the order
of tags to be the same, as defined in DTD/schema. It was introduced
>intentionally: most of programs, which have xml as input, process xml
with wrong order quite well, and developers >got used to the order, they
prefer. So we decided not to validate against element order.
That seems reasonable to me, so long as any order contraint violations
are correctly caught when I explicitly validate. Since you have stated
that explicit validation uses the Xerces validation engine, I would
assume this is the case.
Thanks for the updates!
- Tim
_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
