David, you always have the possibility to deny the question. Tom
At 21:15 28.03.2002 +0300, you wrote: >Hi David, > >Sorry if I misunderstood you, but why IDEA should not ask to rename >getter/setter if you still are going to rename the field? Could you please >clarify your point? > >Best regards, >Eugene Zhuravlev >JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ >"Develop with pleasure!" > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David Smiley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 23:58 >Subject: [Eap-list] Rename sometimes shouldn't rename get/set'er > > > > I'm using build #612. > > > > If I do a rename on a field, and there is a getter/setter for that field, > > and that getter/setter is specified in a class/interface that is not in my > > project source-path, then IDEA should not ask me to rename the >getter/setter > > as well. > > > > This scenario happened to me when I renamed an EntityContext (for EJB) >field > > that I called "entityContext", but later wanted to change it to just > > "context". > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
