Complittely agree with you. Maybe JMV by now working not correct on multi-CPU with write-reordering, but in future this must be worked, and DCL must be correct recognized by IntelliJ Code Analiser
-----Original Message----- From: Cedric ROUVRAIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Eap-list] 614: Code Inspection, constant conditions & NPEs Hi Max, Guess i missed the discussion, however just because the implementation is faulty it doesn't mean that it will always be faulty, some day it will corrected. Having an ide that is compliant to the spec is better than having a ide that is compliant to the defects of the jvm, imo. a++ Cedric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maxim Shafirov Sent: jeudi 28 mars 2002 17:59 To: Cedric ROUVRAIS Subject: Re: [Eap-list] 614: Code Inspection, constant conditions & NPEs Hello Cedric, This topic had already been discussed in eap several days ago. As the matter of fact double synchronization does not makes what it intended to in the current implementation of JVM. -- Best regards, Maxim Shafirov JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!" _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
