> But -- this was requested often -- wouldn't it make sense, if the > SmartCompletion falls back to BasicCompletion if there are no smart > suggestions?
This might make understanding of SmartType completion harder for novice users, I think. Valentin Kipiatkov JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Singer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Eap-list] a few 614 issues > At 19:14 02.04.02 +0400, you wrote: > > > Code completion-- > > > * For autocomplete, I assume there is no way to combine SmartType with > > > Basic in one keymap, but I think such a combined code completion > > > technique would be helpful. Ideally, SmartType would take effect if > > > possible but if it cannot then Basic completion would be in effect. > > > >This is actually not that straightforward. For example in the following > >code: > > > >String s = a<code completion here> > > > >you can either get > > > >String s = aStringVar; > >with SmartType code completion, or > > > >String s = aNonStringVar.getSomeString(); > > > >by using normal completion. So the choice is up to you. > > But -- this was requested often -- wouldn't it make sense, if the > SmartCompletion falls back to BasicCompletion if there are no smart > suggestions? > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
