Jon,
This
feature is currently implemented via Live Templates. You can see those
templates in Tools | Live Templates and it’s
fully use-configurable by user, which classes to see.
Best
regards,
Mike
Aizatsky.
------------------------------
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Jon Steelman
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:20
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Eap-list] SmartType
completion subtleties for Interfaces
I have a few
questions about SmartType completion for Interfaces. I'm not sure to what
extent these issues are bugs as opposed to user education. Here is an example
with questions centering around the distinction between invoking SmartType
without and with the "new" keyword.
public Map methodA() {
return new HashMap();
}
public void methodB() {
Map m = (now do ctrl-shift-space)
+-----------------------------------+
| TreeMap new java.util.TreeMap() |
| HashMap new java.util.HashMap() |
|
methodA()
Map |
+-----------------------------------+
Why doesn't this completion list include all classes that
implement Map such as WeakHashMap, Hashtable, and so on?
Map m = new (now do ctrl-shift-space)
+---------------+
| Map() { ... } |
+---------------+
Why doesn't this single item list include all the
"new class" options that are in the first completion list? It does
make sense that it omits methodA().
Why isn't this interface constructor (that converts to an
anonymous inner class) included in the first completion list? I guess I can
understand the current behavior if it is intentional that we learn a special
distinction that only a typed keyword new preceding the SmartType will invoke
this special case and only this special case.
Should this anonymous inner class interface list include
any interface that extends the type interface? It doesn't when I tried it for
Collection.
Thanks,
Jon
|
