On Fri, 15 May 2015 at 01:47 -0000, Inigo Aldazabal Mensa wrote:
> +1 for this.
>
> I also had a lot of troubles with --dep-graph dependencies. In fact
> I gave up and generated the tree I wanted (it was just a toolchain
> one) in a test VM. But I see myself using this quite often if
> available in my main production system.
Could you or someone post a sample .dot file?
I suspect it shouldn't be much more than something like (made up):
digraph {
"bamtools" -> "unresolved"
"boost" -> "bzip"
"boost" -> "python"
"bzip" -> "zlib"
"tophat" -> "boost"
"tophat" -> "bamtools"
"tophat" -> "zlib"
"zlib" -> "unresolved"
}
with version information on the names and perhaps a little graphviz
annotation (color=, shape=, style=). Order of the dependencies lines
can be arbitrary (above is alphabetical, not a tsort calculated order).
Thanks,
Stuart
--
I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost!
-- Daniel Boone
