Hi Ben,

On 13/10/15 00:07, Ben Roberts wrote:
Hi list,

Recently, it was suggested to me (by wpoely86) that I could patch custom 
configure scripts so that they use the CC, CXX, F77 and F90 environment 
variables, in place of naming the compiler executables explicitly.

I have done this, but for some reason the configure script doesn’t pick these 
up, so that I get empty strings being used. This is obviously a problem as it 
breaks the installation.

I see that the configure script is called by means of run_cmd. If I call “env | 
sort” with run_cmd, the environment variables CC and F90 (for instance) are 
also unavailable. Perhaps this is because run_cmd spawns a new shell that just 
reads in from the resource files (.bashrc, etc.). I could presumably force the 
environment variables in with read_environment, but that seems a bit ugly and 
ad hoc. Is there a better way to do this?

Yes, all commands run via run_cmd are run in a subshell, but that doesn't mean the environment is reset at all...

It does have some consequences, but the other way around: changes in the environment in the subshell are not exposed to the process running the command.

When are you running 'env | sort' with run_cmd exactly (which step, in particular), and which toolchain are you using?

The only case where $CC and co would not be defined by EB is when a 'dummy' toolchain is used.


regards,

Kenneth

Reply via email to