On 24/01/2017 16:56, Benjamin Evans wrote:
​Davide,

Seems like a good idea to me. Would it make sense to build it on top of the gcccuda​ toolchain? Maybe call it fosscuda to fit with several of the other toolchains that include CUDA?

+1, it would make sense, but someone else would have to pull the effort here...

Doing this on top of gcccuda and naming it fosscuda makes sense to me (since 'intelcuda' is already a known toolchain).


K.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Vanzo, Davide <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello world,
    I really like the idea of using foss and intel toolchain as common
    toolchain with other sites. However since we also have GPU nodes
    on our cluster we would need a foss toolchain with CUDA. I know
    that there is goolfc already out there but that does not comply to
    the a/b release frequency as foss does. Plus the fact that it is
    not "fossc" it does not make it obvious to users what it is.
    I was then wondering if any other may benefit from such
    toolchain and if it would be a good idea starting it.

-- Davide Vanzo, PhD
    Application Developer
    Adjunct Assistant Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
    Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education (ACCRE)
    Vanderbilt University - Hill Center 201
    (615)-875-9137 <tel:%28615%29%20875-9137>
    www.accre.vanderbilt.edu <http://www.accre.vanderbilt.edu>



Reply via email to