I have R-3.5.1, Python-3.7.0 and Python-2.7.15 built for 2018b.  I am in the 
process of getting these pushed.  I am pushing the 2018b libraries first.

Before I plunder ahead with a pull request they can be reviewed here:  
https://github.com/FredHutch/easybuild-life-sciences/blob/master/fh_easyconfigs/


John Dey

On 8/15/18, 3:34 AM, "easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be on behalf of Joachim 
Hein" <easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be on behalf of joachim.h...@math.lu.se> 
wrote:

    
    
    > On 15 Aug 2018, at 12:18, Kenneth Hoste <kenneth.ho...@ugent.be> wrote:
    > 
    > Dear Joachim,
    > 
    > On 15/08/2018 11:29, Joachim Hein wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >> I noticed 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_easybuilders_easybuild-2Deasyconfigs_issues_6682&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=3TR-iteG1SyRqQ5yubQg-_2KIAToz9bj5dZrRdW36Hc&m=xQJ-rOglYDVpYgP61bnwZCWIsOArG3zhZwq6npzh0HY&s=F_o0YzRqd_v2kIt6n3YbPE5TtaGQTY8_dRqXxX2Ftrw&e=
 and 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_easybuilders_easybuild-2Deasyconfigs_pull_6703&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=3TR-iteG1SyRqQ5yubQg-_2KIAToz9bj5dZrRdW36Hc&m=xQJ-rOglYDVpYgP61bnwZCWIsOArG3zhZwq6npzh0HY&s=Zk_4ID_w-2HttuYo5o-SHbAl3fJh451rV9XWaekA9K8&e=
    >> I am presently working on moving python packages to foss and intel 2018b 
(h5py was merged, so did boost with python).  Could there please be a 
discussion/statement how we want to handle this?
    >> Also, we need to think how we want to share such important info in our 
community?  Discussion in slack seems not to be working (the channel is to busy 
in my view).  Stumbling about stuff on GitHub is in my view not the best way to 
share info like that.
    >> Thanks for reading.
    > 
    > I was planning to also share this on the mailing list, but you beat me to 
it.
    > 
    > The plan is outlined at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_easybuilders_easybuild-2Deasyconfigs_issues_6682-23issuecomment-2D413003200&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=3TR-iteG1SyRqQ5yubQg-_2KIAToz9bj5dZrRdW36Hc&m=xQJ-rOglYDVpYgP61bnwZCWIsOArG3zhZwq6npzh0HY&s=C1U2AeaGCPl-6qF6BV2EPABGwMWAuRvne8B7vq8fNxo&e=,
 in short:
    > 
    > * get the easyconfigs for Python 3.6.6 with */2018b merged (see 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_easybuilders_easybuild-2Deasyconfigs_pull_6703&d=DwIGaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=3TR-iteG1SyRqQ5yubQg-_2KIAToz9bj5dZrRdW36Hc&m=xQJ-rOglYDVpYgP61bnwZCWIsOArG3zhZwq6npzh0HY&s=Zk_4ID_w-2HttuYo5o-SHbAl3fJh451rV9XWaekA9K8&e=)
    > 
    > * rework easyconfigs already in develop to use Python 3.6.6 rather than 
3.7.0
    > 
    > 
    
    Kenneth,
    
    Thanks.  Are we withdrawing 3.7 or adding 3.6.6?  There is something to be 
said for keeping the 3.7.0 but have the 3.6.6 as the preferred and better 
supported option.  Similar to what we have in the GCC space.  We often have a 
conservative GCC in the standard toolchains, but offer more modern versions 
(e.g. GCC 8.1) as an option with limited support.  The question is, how one 
would communicate that to users …
    
    Is it an option to have an EB quick release, that only releases the new 
Python 3.6.6 (and a few add ons)?  Having that in a proper release makes 
developing python packages (like h5py) so much easier (at least for my 
workflow).
    
    Best wishes
       joachim
    
    
    > regards,
    > 
    > Kenneth
    
    

Reply via email to