Hi Kenneth,

I'm currently trying with the following and its building since roughly 2 hours, 
on a single core though although it was called with -j 32.

easyblock = 'ConfigureMake'
name = 'Libint'
version = '2.6.0'

homepage = 'https://github.com/evaleev/libint'
description = """Libint library is used to evaluate the traditional (electron 
repulsion) and certain novel two-body
 matrix elements (integrals) over Cartesian Gaussian functions used in modern 
atomic and molecular theory."""

toolchain = {'name': 'foss', 'version': '2020a'}
toolchainopts = {'pic': True, 'cstd': 'c++11'}

source_urls = ['https://github.com/evaleev/libint/archive']
sources = ['v%(version)s.tar.gz']
checksums = ['4ae47e8f0b5632c3d2a956469a7920896708e9f0e396ec10071b8181e4c8d9fa']

builddependencies = [
    ('Autotools', '20180311'),
    ('GMP', '6.2.0'),
    ('Boost', '1.72.0'),
    ('Eigen', '3.3.7', '', True),
    ('MPFR', '4.0.2'),
    ('Python', '2.7.18'),
]

preconfigopts = './autogen.sh && '

_lmax = 7

# configure opts motivated by cp2k:
# https://github.com/cp2k/libint-cp2k/blob/master/Jenkinsfile
configopts = '--enable-fortran --enable-eri=1 --enable-eri2=1 --enable-eri3=1 \
               --with-max-am=%d \
               --with-eri-max-am=%d,%d \
               --with-eri2-max-am=%d,%d \
               --with-eri3-max-am=%d,%d \
               --with-opt-am=3 ' % (_lmax, _lmax, _lmax-1, _lmax+2, _lmax+1, 
_lmax+2, _lmax+1)

moduleclass = 'chem'

Greetings
André

----- Am 29. Mai 2020 um 11:35 schrieb Kenneth Hoste [email protected]:

> On 29/05/2020 10:46, André Gemünd wrote:
>> Hi Kenneth,
>>
>> thanks for that. I'm at a similar point but using foss-2020a. I also wanted 
>> to
>> do Intel afterwards, but I thought I'd start with foss because I had some 
>> very
>> weird errors with CP2k and Intel in the past. I'm currently looking more
>> closely at Libint (https://github.com/evaleev/libint/wiki)
>>
>> According to that and the buildflags the cp2k people use, we should be 
>> building
>> Libint with
>>
>> --enable-eri=1 --enable-eri2=1 --enable-eri3=1 \
>>          --with-max-am=${LMAX} \
>>          --with-eri-max-am=${LMAX},$((LMAX-1)) \
>>          --with-eri2-max-am=$((LMAX+2)),$((LMAX+1)) \
>>          --with-eri3-max-am=$((LMAX+2)),$((LMAX+1)) \
>>          --with-opt-am=3
>>
>> I don't see the easyblock doing that, or did I miss it?
> 
> That should be done in the Libint easyconfig, indeed, I'll look into
> that as well.
> 
>> I'm also wondering if it might make sense to put the lmax option in the name 
>> of
>> the package to be a bit more generic? On the other hand, increasing lmax
>> apparently only increases buildtime and library size (according to the README
>> here: https://github.com/cp2k/libint-cp2k). The cp2k guys themselves offer
>> prebuilt binaries for up to lmax 7, so maybe that should be our goto as well?
>> Enabling fortran is not a disadvantage for any other use, so that would be 
>> make
>> the library as generic as possible I guess?
> 
> I think it indeed makes perfect sense to "tag" Libint with versionsuffix
> = '-lmax-7', and not hold back there, unless the build blows up to
> taking hours and consuming GBs of disk space in the installation
> directory (and even then...).
> 
>> Also, it doesn't really matter, but is Python really needed as a builddep? I
>> guess I'll try it out.
> 
> It was added for a reason probably, but I can double check on that...
> 
> Could be to avoid relying on the system Python (which could also be
> Python 3).
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Kenneth
> 
>>
>> Cheers
>> André
>>
>> ----- Am 28. Mai 2020 um 22:13 schrieb Kenneth Hoste [email protected]:
>>
>>> We have requests for CP2K 7.1, so it's on my TODO list.
>>>
>>> I didn't get very far yet, but I'll share what I have:
>>>
>>> * changes to CP2K easyblock:
>>> https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/pull/2069
>>>
>>> * easyconfigs for CP2K 7.1 + deps (doesn't work yet):
>>> https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/pull/10714
>>>
>>> To test:
>>>
>>> eb --include-easyblocks-from-pr 2069 --from-pr 10714 --robot
>>>
>>>
>>> Any help is welcome :)
>>>
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Kenneth
>>>
>>> On 28/05/2020 15:55, André Gemünd wrote:
>>>> Dear Loris,
>>>>
>>>> I just found this message from January because I was looking for CP2k 7.1 
>>>> as
>>>> well. Did you make any progress with that?
>>>>
>>>> Best Greetings
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>> ----- Am 27. Jan 2020 um 15:51 schrieb Loris Bennett 
>>>> [email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was wondering whether any work is going on regarding an EB/EC for CP2L
>>>>> 7.1.  The directory structure seems to have changed such that there is
>>>>> no longer a directory 'makefiles' in the top-level directory, so this
>>>>> bit of the EC
>>>>>
>>>>>    def build_step(self):
>>>>>          """Start the actual build
>>>>>          - go into makefiles dir
>>>>>          - patch Makefile
>>>>>          -build_and_install
>>>>>          """
>>>>>
>>>>>          makefiles = os.path.join(self.cfg['start_dir'], 'makefiles')
>>>>>          change_dir(makefiles)
>>>>>
>>>>> fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Loris
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
> >>>> ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin         Email [email protected]

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. André Gemünd, Leiter IT / Head of IT
Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing
[email protected]
Tel: +49 2241 14-2193
/C=DE/O=Fraunhofer/OU=SCAI/OU=People/CN=Andre Gemuend

Reply via email to