Hi Åke, Using toolchain works. Thanks for the suggestion.
I just worry that it is slightly misleading, if only to myself, to install a binary distribution in a way that makes it look as if it has been compiled. Up to now the fact that a module does not have a toolchain in its name has always been a marker for me to install a source version later, when I find time (although in fact, I never have found time to replace any binary versions ...) Cheers, Loris Åke Sandgren <[email protected]> writes: > You could put it under a toolchain to make it all somewhat simpler since > it will need Python... > > And it should then have a dependency on the corresponding version of > SciPy-Bundle which contains numpy. > > On 9/29/20 1:31 PM, Loris Bennett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If I have a program available as a packed binary, but which has external >> dependencies, such as 'numpy', can I specify a toolchain for the >> dependencies? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Loris >> -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.) ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email [email protected]
