Hi Micael,

Thanks for taking a look at this.  I was able to install libxc 5.2.3.

Thanks also to James for the wget-idea.  It didn't help me yesterday, as
the server just returned 404, but in general it is definitely something
worth remembering.

Cheers,

Loris

Micael Oliveira <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
>  The issue with the Libxc downloads should now be fixed. Unfortunately
>  it took some time to track down a weird issue with the web
> server. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Micael
>
> On 28/3/23 22:18, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
>> External Email
>> ________________________________
>> Hi Loris,
>> It would be great if you could make a PR against libxc!  I'm not
>> that
>> experienced with Git usage ;-)
>> Thanks,
>> Ole
>> On 3/28/23 13:03, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>> Hi Ole,
>>>
>>> Ole Holm Nielsen <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Loris,
>>>>
>>>> I'm being hit by that libxc download problem too!  It's very bad for
>>>> the modules that we're trying to build :-(
>>>>
>>>> Should EB use this download URL in stead?
>>>> https://gitlab.com/libxc/libxc/-/archive/5.2.3/libxc-5.2.3.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it probably should, since, as far as I can tell, this is
>>> probably the canonical version.  Have you already got a patched EC you
>>> could use for a pull request, or shall I created one?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Loris
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ole
>>>>
>>>> On 3/28/23 11:41, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>>>> The EC libxc-5.2.3-GCC-11.3.0.eb downloads the sources from
>>>>>     https://www.tddft.org/programs/libxc
>>>>> However, the site seems to be having issues such that the download
>>>>> gets
>>>>> interrupted before it is complete.  There are other places to get the
>>>>> sources from, i.e.
>>>>>     https://gitlab.com/libxc/libxc
>>>>> and
>>>>>     https://github.com/ElectronicStructureLibrary/libxc
>>>>> but the checksums for the version 5.2.3 are different in these two
>>>>> cases
>>>>> and both different from the checksum in the EC (the Github version is
>>>>> supposed to be a mirror of the Gitlab version).
>>>>> What should happen here?  Should I wait and hope that www.tddft.org
>>>>> stops being so flaky, or should the EC (or at least the next version
>>>>> thereof) be changed to use Gitlab as the source, since this now
>>>>> seems to
>>>>> be the place were development occurs?
>>>>
>> 
>
-- 
Dr. Loris Bennett (Herr/Mr)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin

Reply via email to