phpgroupware was mentioned as an alternative - I can not comment on that as I have never used it. Citadel was also mentioned - this I have used, it had some peculiarities but it seemed to work well and would sync with a number of PIM clients. The version I used (quite some time ago) had a problem with dates in the calender changing time zone when going from one client to another via citadel. This was a long while ago and has probably been fixed. A nice feature was that fields in the address book that were present in a client synced with another client, via citadel, even though citadel did not support those fields. Happy Hunting Peter On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Charl Wentzel <[email protected]> wrote: > Would the open source edition of Zimbra offer enough functionality compared > to eGroupware, e.g. interfacing with Outlook.eBox is not a commercial > product which is one of the reasons for its popularity. Linking it to a > commercially licensed product may not be such a great idea. > > Charl > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Scott Fiduccia" <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 6:33 PM > Subject: [ebox-user] Planning to drop ebox-egroupware support, volunteers > for maintaining it? > To: "eBox users" <[email protected]> > > Agreed... > It would be VERY nice if Zimbra was rolled into Ebox. > > - Scott > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rafael Andrade > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> + 1 >> >> Nice, zimbra is a great tool. >> >> We can add zimbra + kyapanel ( this tool can manage all information in >> zimbra suite open ou enterprise ). >> >> >> >> >> >> Ivan Gutierrez Agramont escreveu: >> >> Hi Everyone >> >> 2010/8/16 Jorge Eduardo Quintão <[email protected]> >> >>> Hi Jose, >>> >>> In the past i did use eGroupware... I had a lot of problems with >>> eGroupware (bugs in felamimail, calendar, syncronization, etc)... I was >>> losing customers to Microsoft Exchange and another groupware solutions >>> when >>> i met Zimbra... Today i can say that i can offer to my customers a good >>> solution (Zimbra)... I believe that eGroupware is a amateur solution when >>> compared with Zimbra... I think the eBox staff should not waste time with >>> eGroupware... >>> >> >> +1 >> >> >>> >>> Maybe a good solution could be write a "HOW TO" called "eBox Integration" >>> explaining how to integrate eBox with another solutions (eGroupware, >>> Zimbra, >>> MailArchiva, Zabbix, etc)... See an example from MailArchiva: >>> >> >>> http://www.mailarchiva.com/knowledge/bin/view/Main/MailSystemIntegration >>> >>> >> Its a great idea (the how to) coz I have the same solution than Jorge >> (zimbra). >> >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> Jorge Quintao > > > > _______________________________________________ > ebox-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ebox-platform.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ebox-user > >
-- Peter Roots [email protected] or [email protected] _______________________________________________ ebox-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ebox-platform.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ebox-user
