The following week would work better for me. I'm done with travel for awhile now and just need to get through my backlog. :}
Thanks, Dave On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Kevin McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Just to clarify, we'd just be looking at CSS technology. > Recognizing that August is vacation month for many, if you want to have > this later in Sept. let me know. > > Regards > Kevin > > ----- Forwarded by Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 07/30/2008 01:43 PM ----- > *Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM* > > 07/29/2008 02:38 PM > To > E4 developer list <[email protected]> cc > Subject > Fw: CSS and declarative UI round up > > > > Hi everyone, > > Some people had expressed to me time conflicts with this original proposal. > We now have some entries in the wiki (thanks all) and I'd like to schedule > a call for us to review where we're at. How would late next week (say > Thurs. Aug 7) or early the following work for people? > > Cheers, > Kevin > > ----- Forwarded by Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 07/29/2008 02:35 PM ----- > *Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM* > > 06/23/2008 02:54 PM > To > "E4 developer list" cc > Subject > CSS and declarative UI round up > > > > Hi folks, > > Over the course of discussions, many folks have come forth with a favorite > CSS/ declarative-UI implementation. So much to choose from! So much to > know! As a first step, I thought it'd be helpful for us to have a roundup > of them all so we can discuss their pros and cons. Eventually we'd all like > to see some working CSS code in e4 eclipse.org repo and at the moment it > seems the main problem is we have too many to choose from (a great problem > to have!). > > What I had in mind was: > > - Those who have some technology they'd like to bring forth prepare a > small presentation of its pros and cons. > - We have a call where they are presented. We can as a group then > better understand our requirements and which technologies fit those. > - Ideally we would have three presentations of 1/2 hour each (including > discussion), plus wrap up discussion, so two hours max for the call. I'd > prefer a shorter call but I don't think that's realistic. If we have more > than three presentations then we can split it into two calls, since I don't > know about you but my attention span nears zero after 2 hours. > - Our goals should be selecting the technology which will be the > initial commit for the purpose of investigation. We may change our minds > later, but we need to start with something. If there are two (or more) > favorite technologies we can commit both, like we have the EMF/non-EMF > modelling work. > > > What do folks think? > > If we like this approach, I'd suggest we aim for a call in approximately > two weeks, to folks time to prep. > > Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > eclipse-incubator-e4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-incubator-e4-dev > >
_______________________________________________ eclipse-incubator-e4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-incubator-e4-dev
