> From: Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 1) Do we agree this is the behaviour we want?
>
I'd certainly like to see this. In particular, when we have talked
publically about how e4 would be more dynamic/responsive to develop for,
this was the kind of thing we had in mind.
> 2) When do we we think we'd provide it?
>
I'd argue that it's worth thinking about it soon, since there are
potentially interesting issues w.r.t. state management, SWT widget
lifecycle, etc.
> 3) I think I can imagine with the current code base how we handle
> on-the-fly creation and deletion, but what about modification?
> Right now the factories 'make', they don't 'modify existing'.
>
... and if we end up with a "destroy and recreate" model, we need to do a
better job of maintaining state than we currently do (e.g. it's not ok for
the tree to be recreated with all the nodes collapsed, etc.)
McQ.
_______________________________________________
eclipse-incubator-e4-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-incubator-e4-dev
