While I can see some potential use in being able to filter the classes 
to be preverified, I think that mixing ME and SE classes in a single 
project is dangerous.  Why can't you create a new SE project that 
depends on the ME project? 

Craig

Mike Vosseller wrote:
> Rushabh,
>
> Try selecting the "Use Built-in Preverifier" option.
>
> Coincidentally I ran into the same problem today too.
>
> Like you I'm experimenting with mixing J2ME and J2SE code within a
> single EclipseME project (Done by adding the standard JRE library on to
> the build path of the project).
>
> The default preverifier choked when it found a class referencing JUnit. 
>
> Switching to the built in preverifier made the problem go away. Not sure
> why though? Is the default preverifier wrong to choke or is the built-in
> preverifier wrong to allow preverification?
>
> It seems very risky to mix j2me and j2se code within one project but
> there are some benefits. Is anyone else doing this? Perhaps a filter for
> the preverifier would be useful.
>
> mike
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rushabh Doshi
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:34 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] Getting eclipseme to ignorecertain
> preverification paths
>
> I apologize; let me try again:
>
> The objective is to have a project where only classes in src/main/java
> are preverified. 
>
> The reason being that attempting to preverify classes that have
> dependencies on junit fails. The same goes for preverifying
> microemulator or any other J2SE related classes.
>
> When the preverification for these classes fails, the preverify loop
> stops and does not continue to preverify the other (J2ME) classes. Not
> to mention the interminable wait trying to preverify classes that you
> know are going to fail anyway.
>
> Since the preverification for src/main/java classes is incomplete,
> trying to run a midlet results in failure because some classes are not
> found (since they haven't been preverified).
>
> Because of this, I can either have
> 1. A project with only J2ME classes that would get preverified just
> fine. No junit though. Or
> 2. A project with junit and other J2SE classes references from the test
> directory - but one that I can't run in an emulated midlet because of
> preverification problems.
>
> I'm trying to get around this, but having the preverifier always ignore
> stuff in src/test/java and/or stuff that I know does not need to be
> preverified because its never going to be loaded into the emulator.
>
> Does this make a bit more sense?
>
> -Rushabh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Craig Setera
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 5:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Eclipseme-users] Getting eclipseme to ignore certain
> preverification paths
>
> Rushabh,
>
> I'm very confused about your request. Preverifying does nothing more 
> than add new stack map attributes to the compiled classes. Those 
> attributes are only used by the JVM and are otherwise ignored. J2SE 
> doesn't care if those attributes are there and will ignore them as 
> necessary. I guess I need to better understand your question/concern 
> before I can offer any real thoughts.
>
> Craig
>
> Rushabh Doshi wrote:
>   
>> This is way more of a feature request than anything else, but I wanted
>>     
>
>   
>> to get thoughts on this before I try and hack eclipseme and make a
>>     
> patch.
>   
>> Here's the problem:
>>
>> Using microemulator, I can get complete junit testing of my MIDP apps.
>>     
>
>   
>> Yay!
>>
>> This causes a bunch of problems with preverification (naturally) since
>>     
>
>   
>> micro / junit uses J2SE and reflection and all the other goodies not 
>> available in ME.
>>
>> At the same time, I want to retain the ability to do/ real/ emulator 
>> (paradox?) testing via eclipseME.
>>
>> Here's my current solution:
>>
>> Add microemulator as a dependency (I'm using maven, so it's a 
>> scope=provided dependency).
>>
>> Turn preverification off for unit testing and running the app within 
>> micro emu.
>>
>> Turn preverification on but take src/test/java off the build path in 
>> order to build for the real emulator.
>>
>> Run the midlet using eclipse me / obfuscate / all the other fun
>>     
> things.
>   
>> This is a bit painful.
>>
>> Here is my proposed solution:
>>
>> Add an option to EclipseME to ignore preverifying certain paths. In my
>>     
>
>   
>> case, this would "src/test/java, microemulator.jar". This is perfectly
>>     
>
>   
>> fine since running the app under eclipseME using the regular emulator 
>> never touches any of the classes in src/test anyway or any of the 
>> microemulator classes and so I won't see the dreaded "class not found"
>>     
>
>   
>> errors.
>>
>> Thoughts? Am I nuts? Is there an easier way of doing this?
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> -Rushabh
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Rushabh Doshi
>>
>> http://keeda.stanford.edu/~radoshi
>>     
> <http://keeda.stanford.edu/%7Eradoshi>
>   
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>   
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>     
> share your
>   
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
>>
>>     
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
> V
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> Eclipseme-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
>>   
>>     
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
> V
> _______________________________________________
> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
> V
> _______________________________________________
> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Eclipseme-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users
>   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Eclipseme-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipseme-users

Reply via email to